Step 3: AI Platform Design
📊 Progress: Step 3 of 4 ⏱️ Estimated Time: 2 hours
Executive Summary
This step involves designing a secure, compliant Azure Landing Zone optimized for AI workloads. You’ll create a comprehensive technical architecture that addresses IFS’s requirements while following Azure best practices for deploying enterprise-grade AI solutions at scale.
Home > AI Ready Challenge > Step 3 - AI Platform Design
This section is part of the IFS AI Ready Challenge. Here, you’ll design the AI Ready Azure Landing Zone platform environment that meets IFS’s regulatory, compliance, and best practice requirements, providing the foundation for future AI workloads.
Table of Contents
- Step 3: AI Platform Design
Note: Generated using Jekyll’s automatic table of contents feature
flowchart LR
A[🚀 Start] --> B[📝 Step 1 Strategy & Plan]
B --> C[đź“‹ Step 2 Requirements]
C --> D[🏗️ Step 3 Foundations]
D -->|Current| E[📊 Step 4 Presentation]
style D fill:#90EE90,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
đź§° Prerequisites
[!NOTE] This step requires collaborative input from multiple teams. Schedule your design workshops in advance to ensure all key stakeholders can participate.
What you need before starting:
- 2-3 collaborative workshop sessions (most teams complete this in 1-2 weeks)
- Key team representatives available for design discussions
- Basic understanding of current Azure setup (if any exists)
- Requirements from Step 2 as input for design decisions
- Access to architecture documentation (if available)
Why Azure Landing Zones Are Essential
Azure Landing Zones provide the foundation for successful AI initiatives. Organizations with proper ALZ foundations experience:
- 70% faster AI deployments with standardized patterns and automation
- Reduced operational complexity through consistent governance and monitoring
- Built-in compliance that prevents common regulatory issues
- Team productivity gains from self-service capabilities with guardrails
- Cost optimization through automated governance and resource management
Success Stories
Teams using ALZ consistently report:
- “Deployment time reduced from weeks to days”
- “No more late-night troubleshooting calls”
- “Compliance audits became routine instead of stressful”
- “Developers can focus on AI innovation instead of infrastructure”
Value by Team (Positive Outcomes)
Team | How ALZ Helps | Typical Results |
---|---|---|
Network Team | Standardized patterns, centralized control, predictable topology | 60% less manual configuration, consistent connectivity |
Security Team | Built-in zero-trust, automated compliance, centralized monitoring | Automated compliance reporting, proactive threat detection |
Infrastructure Team | Self-service with guardrails, standardization, automation | 70% faster deployments, reduced manual tasks |
Development Team | Rapid provisioning, consistent environments | Focus on code instead of infrastructure, faster time-to-market |
Data Team | Built-in data governance, automated classification | Data quality improvements, compliance by design |
AI Team | Pre-configured AI services, embedded responsible AI | Accelerated AI adoption, ethical AI by default |
Essential Foundation Components
[!WARNING] Skipping or bypassing the Azure Landing Zone components below can lead to significant security vulnerabilities, compliance gaps, and operational challenges that are costly and time-consuming to remediate later.
The following ALZ components are foundational for IFS AI success:
âś… Management Group hierarchy with policy inheritance
âś… Azure Policy baselines for compliance automation
âś… Hub-spoke network topology with private endpoints
âś… Identity governance with least-privilege access
âś… Monitoring and alerting for operational excellence
âś… Resource organization with consistent naming and tagging
Example Azure Policy Definition for AI Workloads
{
"properties": {
"displayName": "Deny OpenAI deployments without private endpoints",
"description": "This policy ensures that all Azure OpenAI deployments use private endpoints for secure access",
"mode": "All",
"parameters": {},
"policyRule": {
"if": {
"allOf": [
{
"field": "type",
"equals": "Microsoft.CognitiveServices/accounts"
},
{
"field": "Microsoft.CognitiveServices/accounts/kind",
"equals": "OpenAI"
},
{
"field": "Microsoft.CognitiveServices/accounts/properties.publicNetworkAccess",
"notEquals": "Disabled"
}
]
},
"then": {
"effect": "deny"
}
}
}
}
Objective
Define a scalable, secure, and governed AI Ready Azure Landing Zone architecture by:
- Structuring management groups and subscriptions (platform vs application zones)
- Applying Azure Policy baselines for regulatory and compliance requirements
- Designing network topology and connectivity controls
- Establishing identity, access, and resource organization strategies
- Planning operational readiness (monitoring, management, and governance)
Collaborative Design Activities
Teams work together to design the ALZ foundation that supports everyone’s needs. This collaborative approach ensures successful AI deployment.
[!TIP] Use a visual collaboration tool like Microsoft Whiteboard or Miro for the design sessions to make it easier for remote participants to contribute effectively.
Design Workshop Process (Recommended 2-3 Sessions)
Session 1: Foundation Design (2 hours)
- Review requirements from Step 2: Requirements & Plan
-
Collaborative design activities:
- Management Group Hierarchy Design:
- Work together to define platform and application workload organization
- Team validation: Security and Infrastructure teams confirm the approach works
- Subscription Strategy Planning:
- Map services and workloads to appropriate subscriptions collaboratively
- Team validation: All teams confirm their workload placement makes sense
- Management Group Hierarchy Design:
Session 2: Governance & Security (2 hours)
- Policy Baselines Selection:
- Choose built-in and custom Azure Policy definitions together
- Essential policies: Allowed locations, tag enforcement, diagnostic settings, private endpoints
- Team validation: Security team confirms policies meet compliance needs
- Network Topology Design:
- Design hub-and-spoke or virtual WAN with team input
- Include private endpoints, DDoS protection, firewall controls
- Team validation: Network team confirms topology supports requirements
Session 3: Operations & Identity (1-2 hours)
- Identity & Access Controls Planning:
- Plan Entra ID, RBAC roles, and Managed Identities together
- Focus on least-privileged access principles
- Team validation: Security team confirms identity approach
- Operational Planning:
- Design monitoring (Azure Monitor, Log Analytics), cost management, automation
- Team validation: Operations team confirms approach supports ongoing management
Team Collaboration Framework
Team | Key Contributions | Collaboration Partners |
---|---|---|
Security | Policy definitions, RBAC design, compliance validation | Infrastructure, Network, Data teams |
Network | Network topology, firewall rules, private endpoint strategy | Security, Infrastructure teams |
Infrastructure | Subscription layout, resource organization, naming conventions | All teams for requirements validation |
Development | Development workflow validation, environment requirements | Infrastructure, Security teams |
Data | Data governance policies, classification requirements | Security, AI teams |
AI | AI service requirements, responsible AI controls | Data, Security, Development teams |
Guidance
References:
Management Groups & Subscriptions:
- Use separate management groups for regulatory boundaries (e.g., internet-facing vs internal).
- Deploy platform services (identity, connectivity, management) in dedicated platform subscriptions.
Policy & Compliance:
- Assign policy initiatives for required standards (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA, ISO).
- Enforce resource tagging and diagnostic settings at subscription scope.
Example Azure Policy definition for enforcing tags:
{ "properties": { "displayName": "Require 'Environment' tag on resources", "description": "Enforces the 'Environment' tag on all resources", "mode": "Indexed", "parameters": { "tagName": { "type": "String", "metadata": { "displayName": "Tag Name", "description": "Name of the tag to enforce" }, "defaultValue": "Environment" } }, "policyRule": { "if": { "field": "[concat('tags[', parameters('tagName'), ']')]", "exists": "false" }, "then": { "effect": "deny" } } } }
Networking:
- Implement hub-and-spoke topology with Azure Firewall and DDoS protection.
- Use private endpoints to secure PaaS resource access.
- Deploy Web Application Firewall (WAF) for application layer protection and secure application delivery.
Identity:
- Use Entra ID for tenant-level identity and Managed Identities for resource access.
- Plan RBAC roles at management group and subscription scopes.
Operations:
- Use Azure Policy and Azure Blueprints for repeatable landing zone deployment.
- Set up monitoring and alerting with Log Analytics workspaces.
[!IMPORTANT] For AI workloads, set up dedicated Log Analytics workspaces that collect comprehensive telemetry from both infrastructure components and AI services. This is crucial for end-to-end monitoring and AI-specific operational insights.
Example Landing Zone Architecture Table:
Design Area | Approach/Service | Purpose |
---|---|---|
Management Groups | mgmt-platform, mgmt-app | Segment platform vs application governance |
Subscriptions | sub-platform-id, sub-app-ai | Isolate shared vs AI workloads |
Policy | Allowed Locations, Tag Enforcement, Audit Logs | Enforce compliance and governance |
Network | Hub VNet + Spokes, Firewall, Private Endpoints | Secure connectivity and traffic inspection |
Application Delivery | Web Application Firewall, DDoS Protection | Application layer security and availability protection |
Identity | Entra ID, RBAC, Managed Identities | Least-privilege access and service identities |
Operations | Log Analytics, Azure Monitor, Automation | Monitor health, logs, and automate landing zone setup |
Example Azure Policy Table:
Policy Definition | Purpose | Assignment Scope |
---|---|---|
Allowed locations | Restrict resource deployment to approved regions | Mgmt Group or Subscription |
Require tag and its value | Enforce application of standard tags | Subscription or Resource Group |
Audit diagnostic settings | Ensure diagnostic logs are enabled for resources | Subscription |
Enforce resource naming conventions | Standardize resource names for consistency | Management Group |
Deny public network access on PaaS services | Block public endpoint creation for critical PaaS | Subscription or Resource Group |
Success Criteria âś…
Meeting these criteria ensures your ALZ foundation will support successful AI deployment.
Key Deliverables
To successfully complete this step, you must produce:
âś… Management group and subscription layout diagram - Validated by Infrastructure and Security teams
âś… Policy baseline assignments covering regulatory & compliance controls
âś… Network topology diagram showing secure connectivity - Confirmed by Network team
âś… Identity and access plan with least-privileged operations - Validated by Security team
âś… Operational readiness plan with monitoring, management, automation - Confirmed by Operations team
Team Validation Process
Deliverable | Validation Partners | Success Indicators |
---|---|---|
Management Groups & Subscriptions | Infrastructure Lead, Security Lead | Clear isolation, logical boundaries, team agreement |
Azure Policy Baselines | Security Team, Compliance Officer | Regulatory requirements covered, practical implementation |
Network Design | Network Architect, Security Architect | Zero-trust principles, private connectivity, scalable design |
Identity & Access | Security Lead, Identity Team | Least-privilege implemented, manageable access model |
Operations Plan | Operations Manager, Monitoring Team | Comprehensive observability, automated alerting, sustainable operations |
Team Alignment Checkpoint
Before proceeding to Step 4, confirm team alignment:
- ALZ design addresses each team’s key requirements
- No significant blockers identified for workload deployment
- Operational model is clearly defined and achievable
- Security and compliance requirements are adequately addressed
- Cost governance approach is reasonable and sustainable
Getting Started Tips
- Start simple: Begin with core components, enhance over time
- Focus on essentials: Implement must-have policies first, add nice-to-haves later
- Leverage templates: Use Azure Landing Zone reference architectures as starting points
- Plan for growth: Design for current needs but consider future scale
âś… READY TO PROCEED: When all teams confirm the design meets their needs and supports the AI initiatives.
Navigation
- ⬅️ Previous: Step 2 - Requirements & Plan
- Next: Step 4 - Presentation ➡️
- 🏠AI Ready Challenge Home
References & Supporting Evidence
The statistics and claims used in this document are based on the following industry research and reports:
Security & Compliance Statistics
- 70% of cloud security incidents from poor foundational controls: Microsoft Azure Security Benchmark
- €2.9M average data breach cost: IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2024
- GDPR fine information: GDPR.eu Fine Tracker and European Data Protection Board
Cost & Operational Impact
- 200-400% budget overruns for ungoverned projects: McKinsey Technology Trends 2024
- 70% faster deployments with standardization: Azure Customer Success Stories
- 5-10x cost of retrofitting governance: Cloud Adoption Framework ROI Studies
Industry Best Practices
- Azure Landing Zones methodology: Azure Cloud Adoption Framework
- Well-Architected Framework: Microsoft Azure Well-Architected Framework
- AI governance research: Microsoft Responsible AI Principles