π¦ Rehost Strategy Overview
Lift and Shift: Moving to Azure with minimal changes
π― What is Rehost (Lift & Shift)?
Rehosting is the process of moving applications from on-premises infrastructure to Azure cloud without modifying the application code. Think of it as relocating your office to a new building - youβre moving the same furniture and equipment, just to a better location.
ποΈ Core Concept
---
title: Rehost Migration Process
---
flowchart LR
subgraph OnPrem [π’ On-Premises]
A[π» Physical Servers]
B[ποΈ Local Storage]
C[π On-Prem Network]
D[π± Applications]
end
subgraph Azure [βοΈ Azure Cloud]
E[π₯οΈ Azure VMs]
F[πΎ Azure Disks]
G[π Virtual Network]
H[π± Same Applications]
end
A -.->|Lift & Shift| E
B -.->|Migrate| F
C -.->|Recreate| G
D -.->|Unchanged| H
style OnPrem fill:#ffebee,stroke:#c62828
style Azure fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1976d2
β Key Benefits of Rehost
π Speed & Simplicity
- β‘ Fastest migration path - typically weeks vs. months
- π§ Minimal complexity - no code changes required
- π Predictable process - well-established methodologies
- π₯ Lower skill requirements - infrastructure focus vs. development
π° Cost Effectiveness
- π― Lower upfront investment in migration effort
- π΅ Immediate cost benefits from cloud infrastructure
- π Predictable migration costs - mainly infrastructure setup
- β° Faster time to value - quicker business benefits
π‘οΈ Risk Reduction
- π Application stability - no code changes mean lower risk
- π Proven migration patterns - mature tooling and processes
- π Easier rollback if issues occur
- π¨βπΌ Business continuity - minimal disruption to operations
π Strategic Advantages
- π Quick wins for cloud adoption initiatives
- π Learning opportunity for cloud operations
- π Foundation for future optimization - can refactor later
- β Compliance maintenance - keeps existing security posture
π― Ideal Rehost Scenarios
β Perfect Candidates
π’ Legacy Enterprise Applications
Examples:
βββ π ERP Systems (SAP, Oracle)
βββ ποΈ Legacy databases with complex schemas
βββ π Document management systems
βββ π§ Custom business applications with dependencies
β° Time-Critical Migrations
Scenarios:
βββ π’ Data center closures or lease expiration
βββ π Compliance mandates with tight deadlines
βββ π° Budget cycles requiring quick cloud adoption
βββ π‘οΈ Security incidents requiring rapid migration
π οΈ Complex Dependencies
Characteristics:
βββ π Tightly coupled application components
βββ ποΈ Shared databases across multiple applications
βββ π Complex networking requirements
βββ π Specialized security configurations
π« Rehost Limitations
β οΈ What Rehost Doesnβt Provide
- π Limited performance optimization - same application bottlenecks remain
- π° Higher long-term costs - VM management overhead continues
- π§ Ongoing maintenance burden - OS patching, security updates
- π No cloud-native benefits - auto-scaling, managed services
π Poor Rehost Candidates
β Applications That Shouldnβt Be Rehosted
Avoid Rehost for:
βββ π°οΈ End-of-life applications (retire instead)
βββ π± Modern web applications (refactor to PaaS)
βββ π Applications with frequent updates (benefit from DevOps)
βββ πΈ Cost-sensitive workloads (PaaS often cheaper)
ποΈ Azure Rehost Architecture
π₯οΈ Core Azure Services for Rehost
---
title: Typical Rehost Architecture
---
flowchart TB
subgraph Management [π οΈ Management Layer]
A[π Azure Monitor]
B[π‘οΈ Azure Security Center]
C[π Azure Backup]
end
subgraph Compute [π» Compute Layer]
D[π₯οΈ Azure VMs]
E[π VM Scale Sets]
F[βοΈ Load Balancer]
end
subgraph Storage [πΎ Storage Layer]
G[πΏ Premium SSD]
H[ποΈ Standard Storage]
I[π File Shares]
end
subgraph Network [π Network Layer]
J[π Virtual Network]
K[πͺ Network Security Groups]
L[π VPN Gateway]
end
Management --> Compute
Compute --> Storage
Compute --> Network
style Management fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#f57c00
style Compute fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#388e3c
style Storage fill:#f3e5f5,stroke:#7b1fa2
style Network fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1976d2
π οΈ Service Mapping Guide
On-Premises Component | Azure Equivalent | Purpose |
---|---|---|
π₯οΈ Physical Servers | Azure Virtual Machines | Primary compute resources |
πΎ Local Storage | Azure Managed Disks | Persistent storage for VMs |
π Network Switches | Virtual Network | Network connectivity |
π₯ Firewalls | Network Security Groups | Traffic filtering |
βοΈ Load Balancers | Azure Load Balancer | Traffic distribution |
π Monitoring Tools | Azure Monitor | Performance monitoring |
π Backup Systems | Azure Backup | Data protection |
π Rehost vs. Stay On-Premises
π° Cost Comparison Example
---
title: 3-Year Cost Comparison
---
xychart-beta
title "Total Cost of Ownership (3 Years)"
x-axis [Year 1, Year 2, Year 3]
y-axis "Cost ($1000s)" 0 --> 200
bar [150, 120, 120]
line [100, 85, 85]
π Breakdown:
- π΄ On-Premises Bar: Hardware refresh, maintenance, facility costs
- π΅ Azure Rehost Line: VM costs with reserved instances and optimization
β‘ Performance Considerations
Aspect | On-Premises | Azure Rehost | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
π Performance | Baseline | Similar to baseline | Network latency may vary |
π Scalability | Limited by hardware | Manual scaling | Can add VMs as needed |
π Availability | Hardware dependent | 99.95% SLA | Azure infrastructure reliability |
π‘οΈ Security | Your responsibility | Shared responsibility | Azure handles infrastructure security |
π― Success Metrics
π Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
β Migration Success Metrics
- β° Migration timeline adherence (target: within planned schedule)
- π° Budget compliance (target: within 10% of estimated costs)
- π§ Application functionality (target: 100% feature parity)
- π Performance baselines (target: maintain or improve response times)
π Post-Migration Benefits
- π΅ Infrastructure cost reduction (typical: 20-30% Year 1)
- β‘ Improved availability (target: >99.9% uptime)
- π‘οΈ Enhanced security posture (Azure security features)
- π Backup and recovery improvement (target: RTO/RPO improvements)
π Success Criteria Checklist
- π― All applications migrated without functionality loss
- π₯ User acceptance achieved with minimal complaints
- π Performance benchmarks met or exceeded
- π‘οΈ Security compliance maintained or improved
- π° Cost targets achieved within tolerance
- π Knowledge transfer completed to operations team
π Post-Rehost Optimization
π― Quick Wins After Migration
π° Cost Optimization
Immediate Actions:
βββ π·οΈ Apply Azure Reserved Instances (save 30-70%)
βββ π Right-size VMs based on actual usage
βββ β° Schedule non-production VMs (auto-shutdown)
βββ ποΈ Optimize storage tiers (hot/cool/archive)
β‘ Performance Optimization
Quick Improvements:
βββ π Premium SSD for database VMs
βββ π Enable accelerated networking
βββ π Implement Azure Load Balancer
βββ π Set up auto-scaling for predictable workloads
π Future Modernization Path
---
title: Rehost to Modern Architecture Journey
---
flowchart LR
A[π¦ Rehost<br/>IaaS VMs] --> B[π§ Optimize<br/>Right-size, Monitor]
B --> C[π Containerize<br/>Docker + AKS]
C --> D[βοΈ Cloud-Native<br/>PaaS Services]
A1[β° 0-3 months] --> A
B1[β° 3-6 months] --> B
C1[β° 6-12 months] --> C
D1[β° 12+ months] --> D
style A fill:#f3e5f5,stroke:#4a148c
style B fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#f57c00
style C fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1976d2
style D fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#388e3c
π― Key Takeaways
- π¦ Rehost is the fastest path to cloud adoption with minimal risk
- π° Provides immediate infrastructure benefits without code changes
- π― Ideal for legacy applications and time-critical migrations
- π§ Limited optimization benefits compared to cloud-native approaches
- π Serves as foundation for future cloud modernization
- π Success depends on proper planning and realistic expectations
π Next Steps:
- π§ Implementation Guide - Step-by-step rehost process
- π‘ Best Practices - Proven strategies for success
- π Use Cases & Examples - Real-world scenarios