ποΈ Cloud Adoption Framework Alignment
Ensuring migration strategies align with Microsoft CAF best practices
π― Understanding Cloud Adoption Framework (CAF)
The Microsoft Cloud Adoption Framework provides proven guidance and best practices for cloud adoption. Our migration strategies (Rehost and Refactor) align directly with CAFβs Adopt methodology.
πΊοΈ CAF Overview
---
title: Cloud Adoption Framework Structure
---
flowchart TB
subgraph Strategy [π Strategy]
A[π― Business Justification]
B[π° Business Outcomes]
C[π Business Case]
end
subgraph Plan [π Plan]
D[πΊοΈ Digital Estate]
E[β° Adoption Timeline]
F[π₯ Skills Readiness]
end
subgraph Ready [ποΈ Ready]
G[π Landing Zone]
H[π‘οΈ Security Baseline]
I[π Network Design]
end
subgraph Adopt [π Adopt]
J[π¦ Migrate Workloads]
K[π Modernize Apps]
L[π€ Innovate Solutions]
end
subgraph Govern [βοΈ Govern]
M[π Governance Disciplines]
N[π Security Baseline]
O[π° Cost Management]
end
subgraph Manage [π οΈ Manage]
P[π Operations Baseline]
Q[π Business Continuity]
R[π Performance Monitoring]
end
Strategy --> Plan --> Ready --> Adopt
Adopt --> Govern
Adopt --> Manage
style Strategy fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1976d2
style Plan fill:#f3e5f5,stroke:#7b1fa2
style Ready fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#388e3c
style Adopt fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#f57c00,stroke-width:3px
style Govern fill:#ffebee,stroke:#c62828
style Manage fill:#f1f8e9,stroke:#558b2f
π― Adopt Methodology Deep Dive
π¦ Migrate (Rehost) Alignment
Our Rehost strategy directly implements CAFβs Migrate approach:
β CAF Migrate Principles
- π Minimal business logic changes - preserve existing functionality
- β‘ Fast time to value - quickest path to cloud benefits
- π‘οΈ Risk mitigation - proven migration patterns
- π Foundation for optimization - platform for future improvements
π― Migration Process Alignment
---
title: CAF Migrate Process vs Our Rehost Guide
---
flowchart LR
subgraph CAF [ποΈ CAF Migrate Process]
A[π Assess]
B[π¦ Migrate]
C[β
Release]
D[π Secure & Manage]
end
subgraph Guide [π Our Rehost Guide]
E[π Assessment Tools]
F[π οΈ Implementation Steps]
G[β
Validation Process]
H[π Operations Setup]
end
A -.-> E
B -.-> F
C -.-> G
D -.-> H
style CAF fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1976d2
style Guide fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#388e3c
π Modernize (Refactor) Alignment
Our Refactor strategy implements CAFβs Modernize approach:
β CAF Modernize Principles
- βοΈ Cloud-native capabilities - leverage managed services
- π Performance optimization - improve scalability and efficiency
- π° Cost optimization - reduce long-term operational costs
- π Innovation enablement - foundation for advanced features
π― Modernization Process Alignment
---
title: CAF Modernize Process vs Our Refactor Guide
---
flowchart LR
subgraph CAF [ποΈ CAF Modernize Process]
A[π Evaluate]
B[π§ Optimize]
C[π Deploy]
D[π Monitor]
end
subgraph Guide [π Our Refactor Guide]
E[π― Service Selection]
F[βοΈ Code Modifications]
G[π CI/CD Pipeline]
H[π Performance Tracking]
end
A -.-> E
B -.-> F
C -.-> G
D -.-> H
style CAF fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1976d2
style Guide fill:#f3e5f5,stroke:#7b1fa2
π CAF Design Principles Implementation
ποΈ Landing Zone Design
Both migration strategies require proper Azure Landing Zones:
---
title: Azure Landing Zone Structure
---
flowchart TB
subgraph Management [π οΈ Management Groups]
A[π’ Root Management Group]
B[πΌ Business Unit MGs]
end
subgraph Identity [π€ Identity & Access]
C[π Azure AD Tenant]
D[π₯ User Groups]
E[π Service Principals]
end
subgraph Network [π Networking]
F[π Hub Virtual Network]
G[π§ Spoke Networks]
H[πͺ VPN/ExpressRoute]
end
subgraph Security [π‘οΈ Security]
I[π Azure Policy]
J[π Security Center]
K[π Azure Sentinel]
end
subgraph Workloads [π» Workload Subscriptions]
L[π¦ Rehost Workloads]
M[π Refactor Workloads]
end
Management --> Identity
Management --> Network
Management --> Security
Management --> Workloads
style Management fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1976d2
style Identity fill:#f3e5f5,stroke:#7b1fa2
style Network fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#388e3c
style Security fill:#ffebee,stroke:#c62828
style Workloads fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#f57c00
π‘οΈ Security Baseline Implementation
Security Area | Rehost Implementation | Refactor Implementation |
---|---|---|
π Identity | Azure AD integration | Azure AD B2C for modern auth |
π Network | NSGs, firewalls | App Gateway, Front Door WAF |
πΎ Data | Disk encryption | Transparent data encryption |
π Monitoring | Azure Monitor for VMs | Application Insights |
π Secrets | Key Vault integration | Managed Identity access |
π Governance Integration
βοΈ Policy Implementation
---
title: Azure Policy Enforcement
---
flowchart LR
subgraph Policies [π Policy Categories]
A[π‘οΈ Security Policies]
B[π° Cost Policies]
C[π·οΈ Tagging Policies]
D[π Network Policies]
end
subgraph Rehost [π¦ Rehost Compliance]
E[π VM Security Config]
F[πΎ Backup Requirements]
G[π·οΈ Resource Tagging]
H[π Network Isolation]
end
subgraph Refactor [π Refactor Compliance]
I[π App Service Config]
J[ποΈ Database Security]
K[π·οΈ Service Tagging]
L[π API Management]
end
Policies --> Rehost
Policies --> Refactor
style Policies fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1976d2
style Rehost fill:#f3e5f5,stroke:#7b1fa2
style Refactor fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#388e3c
π·οΈ Tagging Strategy
Both strategies implement consistent tagging:
Required Tags for All Resources:
βββ π’ BusinessUnit: [Finance, Marketing, IT]
βββ π― Environment: [Dev, Test, Prod]
βββ π€ Owner: [email@company.com]
βββ π° CostCenter: [12345]
βββ π
CreatedDate: [YYYY-MM-DD]
βββ π MaintenanceWindow: [Saturday-2AM]
βββ π¦ MigrationStrategy: [Rehost, Refactor]
π° Cost Management Alignment
π Cost Governance Framework
---
title: Cost Management Integration
---
flowchart TB
subgraph Planning [π Cost Planning]
A[π° Budget Allocation]
B[π Cost Forecasting]
C[π― Cost Targets]
end
subgraph Monitoring [π Cost Monitoring]
D[π Cost Alerts]
E[π Usage Tracking]
F[π‘ Recommendations]
end
subgraph Optimization [π§ Cost Optimization]
G[π·οΈ Reserved Instances]
H[π Right-sizing]
I[β° Auto-shutdown]
end
Planning --> Monitoring --> Optimization
style Planning fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1976d2
style Monitoring fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#388e3c
style Optimization fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#f57c00
π΅ Cost Optimization by Strategy
Optimization Area | Rehost Approach | Refactor Approach |
---|---|---|
π₯οΈ Compute | VM Reserved Instances | App Service Plans |
πΎ Storage | Storage tier optimization | Blob lifecycle policies |
π Network | VPN vs ExpressRoute | CDN optimization |
ποΈ Database | SQL VM optimization | Managed database tiers |
π Monitoring | Basic VM monitoring | Application-level insights |
π οΈ Operations Management
π Operations Baseline
---
title: Operations Management Structure
---
flowchart LR
subgraph Monitor [π Monitoring]
A[π Azure Monitor]
B[π Log Analytics]
C[π¨ Alerting Rules]
end
subgraph Backup [π Backup & Recovery]
D[πΎ Azure Backup]
E[π Site Recovery]
F[π Recovery Plans]
end
subgraph Security [π‘οΈ Security Operations]
G[π Security Center]
H[π Sentinel SIEM]
I[π¨ Incident Response]
end
subgraph Automation [π€ Automation]
J[π§ Azure Automation]
K[π Update Management]
L[π― Desired State Config]
end
Monitor --> Backup
Monitor --> Security
Monitor --> Automation
style Monitor fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1976d2
style Backup fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#388e3c
style Security fill:#ffebee,stroke:#c62828
style Automation fill:#f3e5f5,stroke:#7b1fa2
π Operations Checklist by Strategy
π¦ Rehost Operations
- π₯οΈ VM monitoring and alerting configured
- πΎ Backup policies for all VMs and data
- π Update management for OS patching
- π‘οΈ Security monitoring for infrastructure
- π Performance baselines established
- π― Disaster recovery plans tested
π Refactor Operations
- π Application Insights monitoring enabled
- π Automated deployments via CI/CD
- π Auto-scaling rules configured
- π‘οΈ Security scanning in pipeline
- π Performance testing automated
- π― Blue-green deployments capability
π Success Metrics & KPIs
π― CAF-Aligned Success Measures
CAF Area | Key Metrics | Rehost Targets | Refactor Targets |
---|---|---|---|
π° Financial | Cost optimization | 20-30% reduction | 40-60% reduction |
β‘ Performance | Response time | Maintain baseline | 30-50% improvement |
π‘οΈ Security | Security incidents | Reduce by 50% | Reduce by 70% |
π Operational | MTTR | Improve by 30% | Improve by 60% |
π Business | Time to market | Maintain current | Improve by 40% |
π Maturity Assessment
---
title: Cloud Adoption Maturity Progression
---
flowchart LR
A[π― Basic<br/>Infrastructure] --> B[π¦ Rehost<br/>Migration]
B --> C[π Refactor<br/>Optimization]
C --> D[ποΈ Rearchitect<br/>Cloud-Native]
D --> E[π Innovate<br/>AI/ML Integration]
A1[Level 1] --> A
B1[Level 2] --> B
C1[Level 3] --> C
D1[Level 4] --> D
E1[Level 5] --> E
style A fill:#ffebee,stroke:#c62828
style B fill:#f3e5f5,stroke:#7b1fa2
style C fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#388e3c
style D fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1976d2
style E fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#f57c00
π CAF Resources Integration
π Essential CAF Documentation
- π Cloud Adoption Framework - Complete framework overview
- ποΈ Landing Zone Design - Infrastructure foundation
- π¦ Migrate Methodology - Migration guidance
- π Modernize Guidance - Application modernization
- βοΈ Governance Framework - Governance implementation
π οΈ CAF Tools Integration
Tool Category | CAF Tool | Our Implementation |
---|---|---|
π Assessment | Azure Migrate | Workload discovery and planning |
ποΈ Architecture | Azure Architecture Center | Reference architectures |
βοΈ Governance | Azure Policy | Compliance enforcement |
π° Cost | Azure Cost Management | Budget and optimization |
π‘οΈ Security | Azure Security Center | Security monitoring |
π― Key Takeaways
- ποΈ CAF provides proven framework for structured cloud adoption
- π¦ Rehost aligns with CAF Migrate methodology for fast cloud entry
- π Refactor implements CAF Modernize approach for optimization
- π‘οΈ Both strategies require proper landing zone foundation
- βοΈ Governance and operations are critical for long-term success
- π Success measurement should align with CAF KPIs
π Next Steps:
- ποΈ Well-Architected Framework - Technical excellence principles
- π Design Principles - Architectural best practices
- π§ Implementation Guides - Apply CAF in practice