🏗️ Well-Architected Framework Alignment

Ensuring migration strategies follow Azure WAF best practices

---

🎯 Understanding Well-Architected Framework (WAF)

The Azure Well-Architected Framework provides architectural guidance based on five key pillars. Both Rehost and Refactor strategies must align with these pillars to ensure successful, sustainable cloud solutions.

🏛️ The Five Pillars

---
title: Azure Well-Architected Framework Pillars
---
flowchart TB
    subgraph WAF [🏗️ Well-Architected Framework]
        A[🛡️ Security<br/>Protect against threats]
        B[🔄 Reliability<br/>Resilient and available]
        C[⚡ Performance<br/>Efficient and scalable]
        D[💰 Cost Optimization<br/>Maximize value]
        E[🎯 Operational Excellence<br/>Run and monitor]
    end
    
    subgraph Migration [📦 Migration Strategies]
        F[📦 Rehost Implementation]
        G[🔄 Refactor Implementation]
    end
    
    WAF --> Migration
    
    style A fill:#ffebee,stroke:#c62828
    style B fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#388e3c
    style C fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1976d2
    style D fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#f57c00
    style E fill:#f3e5f5,stroke:#7b1fa2
    style Migration fill:#f1f8e9,stroke:#558b2f

🛡️ Security Pillar Implementation

🔐 Defense in Depth Strategy

Both migration strategies implement layered security:

---
title: Security Layers for Migration
---
flowchart TB
    subgraph Identity [👤 Identity & Access]
        A[🔐 Azure Active Directory]
        B[👥 Role-Based Access Control]
        C[🔑 Privileged Identity Management]
    end
    
    subgraph Network [🌐 Network Security]
        D[🚪 Network Security Groups]
        E[🔥 Azure Firewall]
        F[🛡️ DDoS Protection]
    end
    
    subgraph App [📱 Application Security]
        G[🌐 Web Application Firewall]
        H[🔒 SSL/TLS Encryption]
        I[🛡️ API Management Security]
    end
    
    subgraph Data [🗄️ Data Protection]
        J[🔐 Encryption at Rest]
        K[🔒 Encryption in Transit]
        L[🔑 Key Vault Management]
    end
    
    Identity --> Network --> App --> Data
    
    style Identity fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1976d2
    style Network fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#388e3c
    style App fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#f57c00
    style Data fill:#ffebee,stroke:#c62828

🔒 Security by Migration Strategy

Security Aspect	Rehost Approach	Refactor Approach
🔐 Identity	Azure AD Connect	Azure AD B2C integration
🌐 Network	NSGs, VPN Gateway	App Gateway, Front Door
📱 Application	VM-level security	WAF, API Management
🗄️ Data	Disk encryption	TDE, Always Encrypted
🔑 Secrets	Key Vault basic	Managed Identity access
📊 Monitoring	Security Center	Advanced Threat Protection

✅ Security Checklist

📦 Rehost Security Requirements

• 🔐 Azure AD integration configured
• 🌐 Network segmentation implemented
• 💾 Disk encryption enabled
• 🔑 Key Vault for secrets management
• 📊 Security monitoring enabled
• 🔄 Backup encryption configured
• 🛡️ Antimalware protection active

🔄 Refactor Security Requirements

• 🔐 Managed Identity for service authentication
• 🌐 WAF protection for web applications
• 🗃️ Database security features enabled
• 🔒 API security with OAuth/OpenID
• 📊 Application security monitoring
• 🔐 Container security if using containers
• 🛡️ DevSecOps pipeline integration

🔄 Reliability Pillar Implementation

🎯 Availability and Resilience

---
title: Reliability Architecture Patterns
---
flowchart LR
    subgraph Single [🎯 Single Region]
        A[⚖️ Load Balancer]
        B[🖥️ Multiple VMs/Instances]
        C[🗄️ Replicated Storage]
    end
    
    subgraph Multi [🌍 Multi-Region]
        D[🌐 Traffic Manager]
        E[🏠 Primary Region]
        F[🔄 Secondary Region]
    end
    
    subgraph Backup [💾 Backup & Recovery]
        G[🔄 Azure Backup]
        H[🔄 Site Recovery]
        I[📊 Recovery Testing]
    end
    
    Single --> Multi
    Multi --> Backup
    
    style Single fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#388e3c
    style Multi fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1976d2
    style Backup fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#f57c00

📊 Reliability Targets by Strategy

Reliability Metric	Rehost Target	Refactor Target
⏰ Availability SLA	99.9% (VM SLA)	99.95% (PaaS SLA)
🔄 Recovery Time (RTO)	4-8 hours	1-2 hours
💾 Recovery Point (RPO)	1 hour	15 minutes
🌍 Multi-region	Manual failover	Automated failover
📊 Health monitoring	Basic VM metrics	Application-level health

🛠️ Reliability Implementation

📦 Rehost Reliability Features

Infrastructure Reliability:
├── 🔄 Availability Sets for VM placement
├── ⚖️ Load Balancer for traffic distribution
├── 💾 Azure Backup for data protection
├── 🔄 Azure Site Recovery for DR
├── 📊 Azure Monitor for health checks
└── 🚨 Alert rules for proactive monitoring

🔄 Refactor Reliability Features

Platform Reliability:
├── 🌐 App Service multi-instance deployment
├── 🔄 Auto-scaling based on demand
├── 🗃️ Database automatic failover
├── 🌍 Multi-region deployment capability
├── 📊 Application Insights health monitoring
└── 🔄 Blue-green deployment strategies

⚡ Performance Efficiency Pillar

🚀 Performance Optimization Strategy

---
title: Performance Optimization Approach
---
flowchart TD
    subgraph Baseline [📊 Performance Baseline]
        A[📈 Current Metrics]
        B[🎯 Target Metrics]
        C[📊 Benchmarking]
    end
    
    subgraph Optimize [⚡ Optimization Areas]
        D[💻 Compute Optimization]
        E[💾 Storage Optimization]
        F[🌐 Network Optimization]
        G[🗄️ Database Optimization]
    end
    
    subgraph Monitor [📊 Continuous Monitoring]
        H[📈 Performance Metrics]
        I[🚨 Alert Thresholds]
        J[🔄 Auto-scaling Rules]
    end
    
    Baseline --> Optimize --> Monitor
    
    style Baseline fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1976d2
    style Optimize fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#388e3c
    style Monitor fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#f57c00

📈 Performance Comparison

Performance Area	On-Premises Baseline	Rehost Performance	Refactor Performance
🚀 Response Time	500ms	450ms (10% better)	300ms (40% better)
📊 Throughput	1000 req/min	1200 req/min	2500 req/min
💾 Storage IOPS	1000 IOPS	3000 IOPS (Premium)	Unlimited (managed)
🌍 Global Latency	N/A	VPN dependent	CDN optimized
📈 Scalability	Manual	Manual VM scaling	Auto-scaling

🎯 Performance Best Practices

📦 Rehost Performance Optimization

• 🖥️ Right-size VMs based on actual usage patterns
• 💾 Use Premium SSD for performance-critical workloads
• 🌐 Enable accelerated networking for network-intensive apps
• 📊 Implement caching with Azure Cache for Redis
• ⚖️ Configure load balancing for traffic distribution

🔄 Refactor Performance Benefits

• 🔄 Auto-scaling responds to demand automatically
• 🌍 CDN integration reduces global latency
• 🗃️ Managed database optimization and tuning
• 📊 Application-level monitoring for bottleneck identification
• 🚀 Serverless compute for event-driven workloads

💰 Cost Optimization Pillar

📊 Cost Management Strategy

---
title: Cost Optimization Framework
---
flowchart LR
    subgraph Planning [📋 Cost Planning]
        A[💰 Budget Setting]
        B[📊 Cost Forecasting]
        C[🎯 Cost Allocation]
    end
    
    subgraph Monitoring [📈 Cost Monitoring]
        D[📊 Usage Tracking]
        E[🚨 Budget Alerts]
        F[📈 Cost Analysis]
    end
    
    subgraph Optimization [🔧 Cost Optimization]
        G[🏷️ Reserved Instances]
        H[📊 Right-sizing]
        I[⏰ Resource Scheduling]
        J[🗄️ Storage Optimization]
    end
    
    Planning --> Monitoring --> Optimization
    
    style Planning fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1976d2
    style Monitoring fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#388e3c
    style Optimization fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#f57c00

💵 Cost Comparison Analysis

Cost Category	On-Premises Annual	Rehost Annual	Refactor Annual
🖥️ Compute	$120,000	$80,000	$50,000
💾 Storage	$30,000	$25,000	$15,000
🌐 Network	$20,000	$15,000	$10,000
👥 Operations	$80,000	$60,000	$30,000
🛡️ Security	$25,000	$15,000	$10,000
📊 Total	$275,000	$195,000	$115,000
💰 Savings	Baseline	29% savings	58% savings

🎯 Cost Optimization Strategies

📦 Rehost Cost Optimization

Immediate Savings:
├── 🏷️ Azure Reserved Instances (30-70% savings)
├── 📊 VM right-sizing based on metrics
├── ⏰ Auto-shutdown for dev/test environments
├── 💾 Storage tier optimization (hot/cool/archive)
├── 🌐 Bandwidth optimization
└── 🔄 Backup policy optimization

🔄 Refactor Cost Benefits

Long-term Savings:
├── 🌐 PaaS pricing models (pay-per-use)
├── 🔄 Auto-scaling reduces idle costs
├── 🛠️ Reduced operational overhead
├── 📊 Managed service efficiency
├── 🚀 Serverless compute for sporadic workloads
└── 🌍 Global optimization through CDN

🎯 Operational Excellence Pillar

🛠️ Operations Management

---
title: Operational Excellence Framework
---
flowchart TB
    subgraph DevOps [🔄 DevOps Practices]
        A[📦 CI/CD Pipelines]
        B[🧪 Automated Testing]
        C[📊 Infrastructure as Code]
    end
    
    subgraph Monitoring [📊 Monitoring & Alerting]
        D[📈 Application Monitoring]
        E[🖥️ Infrastructure Monitoring]
        F[🚨 Intelligent Alerting]
    end
    
    subgraph Governance [⚖️ Governance & Compliance]
        G[📋 Policy Enforcement]
        H[🏷️ Resource Tagging]
        I[📊 Compliance Reporting]
    end
    
    DevOps --> Monitoring --> Governance
    
    style DevOps fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#388e3c
    style Monitoring fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1976d2
    style Governance fill:#f3e5f5,stroke:#7b1fa2

📊 Operational Maturity by Strategy

Operational Area	Rehost Maturity	Refactor Maturity
🔄 Deployment	Manual/scripted	Fully automated CI/CD
📊 Monitoring	Infrastructure-focused	Application-aware
🚨 Alerting	Reactive	Predictive analytics
🛠️ Maintenance	Manual patching	Automated updates
📋 Documentation	Traditional docs	Living documentation
🧪 Testing	Manual testing	Automated test suites

✅ Operational Excellence Checklist

📦 Rehost Operations

• 🔄 Backup automation configured and tested
• 📊 Monitoring dashboards for infrastructure
• 🚨 Alert rules for critical thresholds
• 🛠️ Patch management strategy implemented
• 📋 Runbooks for common operations
• 🧪 Disaster recovery testing scheduled

🔄 Refactor Operations

• 🔄 CI/CD pipelines for automated deployment
• 📊 Application Insights comprehensive monitoring
• 🚨 Smart alerting with ML-based anomaly detection
• 🛠️ Auto-scaling rules and policies
• 📋 Infrastructure as Code for repeatability
• 🧪 Blue-green deployments for zero-downtime

📈 WAF Assessment & Scoring

🎯 WAF Review Process

---
title: Well-Architected Review Process
---
flowchart LR
    A[📋 Initial Assessment] --> B[🔍 Pillar Review]
    B --> C[📊 Gap Analysis]
    C --> D[🎯 Recommendations]
    D --> E[📈 Implementation]
    E --> F[🔄 Continuous Review]
    
    style A fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1976d2
    style B fill:#e8f5e8,stroke:#388e3c
    style C fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#f57c00
    style D fill:#f3e5f5,stroke:#7b1fa2
    style E fill:#ffebee,stroke:#c62828
    style F fill:#f1f8e9,stroke:#558b2f

📊 WAF Scoring Matrix

Pillar	Weight	Rehost Score	Refactor Score
🛡️ Security	25%	7/10	9/10
🔄 Reliability	20%	6/10	8/10
⚡ Performance	20%	6/10	9/10
💰 Cost Optimization	20%	8/10	9/10
🎯 Operational Excellence	15%	5/10	8/10
📊 Overall Score	100%	6.4/10	8.6/10

🎯 Improvement Recommendations

📦 Rehost WAF Improvements

Priority Improvements:
├── 🎯 Implement automated deployment processes
├── 📊 Enhance application-level monitoring
├── 🔄 Add auto-scaling capabilities
├── 🛡️ Strengthen identity management
└── 🧪 Implement automated testing

🔄 Refactor WAF Excellence

Advanced Optimizations:
├── 🌍 Multi-region deployment strategy
├── 🤖 AI-powered monitoring and alerting
├── 🔐 Zero-trust security model
├── 📊 Advanced cost optimization algorithms
└── 🚀 Chaos engineering practices

---

🎯 Key Takeaways

• 🏗️ WAF provides technical excellence framework for both strategies
• 📦 Rehost achieves good baseline across all pillars
• 🔄 Refactor enables higher WAF scores through cloud-native features
• 📊 Continuous assessment ensures ongoing optimization
• 🎯 Both strategies can achieve WAF compliance with proper implementation
• 📈 Success measurement should include WAF scoring

---

📖 Next Steps:

• 📐 Design Principles - Architectural best practices
• 🔧 Implementation Guides - Apply WAF principles
• 🛠️ Migration Tools - WAF-aligned tooling